Nederlandse Grondwet:
Europarlementariėrs schieten hervormingsvoorstellen Europol af (en)
| Hoofdstukken Grondwet | |
|---|---|
| 1. | Grondrechten |
| 2. | Regering |
| 3. | Staten-Generaal |
| 4. | Overige instellingen |
| 5. | Wetgeving en bestuur |
| 6. | Rechtspraak |
| 7. | Andere overheden |
| 8. | Herziening Grondwet |
-
21-05Commissie botst met lidstaten over fusie agentschappen (en)
-
07-05Agentschappen EUROPOL en CEPOL tegen voorstel EC over samenvoegen (en)
-
28-03EU wil een sterker Europol (en)
-
27-03Europese Commissie wil Europol verder versterken en enige trainingscentrum maken (en)
-
27-03Europol: spil in ontwikkeling samenwerking en training
-
27-03Veelgestelde vragen over vergroten rol Europol in lokale samenwerking en training (en)
-
18-02Europese Commissie overweegt fusie tussen agentschappen EU-politie (en)
-
01-02Nederland blijft spil in drugshandel
-
11-01Eurocommissaris Malmström opent EU-Centrum voor Cybercrime in Den Haag (en)
-
19-12-2012Nieuw centrum tegen cybercriminaliteit in januari van start (en)
-
07-06-2012Raadsconclusies over inzet Europol in strijd tegen grensoverschrijdende criminaliteit (en)
-
28-03-2012Den Haag krijgt Europees cybercrimecentrum
-
28-03-2012EU-centrum voor bestrijding van cybercriminaliteit moet internet veiliger maken en consumenten online beschermen
-
12-01-2012Europol rolt internationaal drugsnetwerk op
-
01-08-2011Brits parlement: laat Turkije bij Europol (en)
-
01-07-2011Europol alert op risico's Arabische lente
-
10-06-2011Koningin Beatrix opent het nieuwe hoofdkantoor van Europol in Den Haag
-
19-04-2011Europol: Arabische lente vergroot terroristisch gevaar in EU (en)
-
25-01-2011Europese drugshandelaren zetten kleine vliegtuigjes in
-
15-07-2010EU veiligheidsstrategie tegen 2014
EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - The European Parliament on Tuesday (24 November) rejected reform proposals for the bloc's police and anti-terrorism agency, Europol, in an attempt to delay the decision until after the new EU treaty comes into force, granting the legislature more powers.
The proposals covered changes to the confidentiality of Europol information, exchange of personal data with partners such as Interpol, agreements with non-EU countries and assistance with criminal investigations.
MEPs argued that the rules should not be altered until the EU legislature gets equal footing with member states in the field of justice and home affairs next Tuesday (1 December), when the Lisbon Treaty comes into force.
The Europol reform could still pass, regardless of the MEPs' protests, when justice and home affairs minister meet in Brussels next Monday (30 November).
"The rush of the Council is embarrassing," said Dutch Liberal MEP Sophie in't Veld.
Over 600 of her colleagues, out of the 736-strong parliament, voted against the reform package and asked the Council to table a new one in the coming six months. The four motions had a purely "consultative" force and were not legally-binding, however.
A similar initiative by the Green group to thwart the adoption of a new EU-US bank data transfer deal on 30 November also fell through, with the motion failing to make the Strasbourg plenary agenda.
The so-called Swift banking agreement is likely to be adopted by ministers on Monday.
The prospect of having to start negotiations from scratch, once MEPs have an equal say on the matter, is enough of an incentive for ministers to adopt it on 30 November, one EU diplomat said.
According to the provisional agenda of next week's ministerial meeting, ministers are due to "authorise the signing of an agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of financial messaging data for purposes of the Terrorist Finance Tracking Programme."
The deal will allow American authorities to access information from the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (Swift), an inter-bank data processing centre, as well as other, similar companies in Europe.
Swift in 2006 was thrust into the centre of an EU-US dispute after it emerged that the American authorities were been secretly using information on European transactions as part of their so-called War on Terror.
A Belgium-based company, Swift kept some databases on US territory, giving Washington a legal handle on its global activities. Its plans to shift European data to a new Swiss-based centre prompted the need for the new EU-US deal.
The company records international transactions worth trillions of dollars daily, between nearly 8,000 financial institutions in over 200 countries.
Meer over...
